Ageing at work: impact and consequences – a scoping review
PDF

Palavras-chave

aging
stereotypes
occupational health

Como Citar

Ageing at work: impact and consequences – a scoping review. (2025). RIAGE - Revista Ibero-Americana De Gerontologia, 7(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.61415/riage.259

Resumo

Introduction: Ageism, characterised by discriminatory attitudes towards older individuals based on negative stereotypes, is present in various aspects of society, including workplaces, public spaces, and healthcare settings, influencing the psychological well-being of the ones affected. Particularly in the workplace, ageism poses significant challenges for older workers, affecting their productivity and job satisfaction. As the workforce continues to age globally, it’s becoming increasingly important to address the consequences of ageism on psychological health. Methods: A scoping review to map the evidence concerning the impact of ageism on the psychological state and well-being of older workers. Following the JBI methodological recommendations, search was realized from March to April 2024, using PubMed, MedLine and CINAHL databases as well as grey literature to identify relevant articles. Studies in which the participants were older adults, focusing on the influence of aging on psychological well-being within occupational contexts. Were included studies published in English, Spanish and Portuguese developed in the last 10 years. From 38 citations initially retrieved, 8 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: Articles highlight prevailing stereotypes that influence treatment in the workplace, resulting in discriminatory practices and behaviour towards older workers.  Workplace ageism has significant psychological consequences, leading to negative perceptions of aging and increasing aging anxiety among older workers and harmful health behaviours, stress, depressive symptoms, and long-term illness affecting job satisfaction and retirement intentions. Conclusion: Addressing ageism in occupational settings is crucial to promote well-being and productivity of older workers and create inclusive work environments favourable to successful aging.

PDF

Referências

Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDR015

Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2020). 11.1 Introduction to Scoping reviews. JBI Manuals for Evidence Synthesis. https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/11.1+Introduction+to+Scoping+reviews

Clara, M., De, P., Couto, P., Nikitin, J., Graf, · Sylvie, Fung, H. H., Hess, T. M., Liou, S., & Rothermund, K. (2023). Do we all perceive experiences of age discrimination in the same way? Cross-cultural differences in perceived age discrimination and its association with life satisfaction. European Journal of Ageing, 20(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-023-00790-x

Department of Labor, U. (2012). Monthly Labor Review, January 2012: Labor force projections to 2020: a more slowly growing workforce. www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2012/01/errata.pdf.

Cedefop. (2010). Working and ageing: Emerging theories and empirical perspectives (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Ed.; VI). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2801/2277

Fatfouta, R., & Ghoniem, A. (2022). Old, but gold? A dual-pathway model of age bias in personnel selection decisions. Applied Psychology, 71(2), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/APPS.12336

Fernandes, F., Turra, C. M., & Rios-Neto, E. L. G. (2023). World population aging as a function of period demographic conditions. Demographic Research, 48, 353–372. https://doi.org/10.4054/DEMRES.2023.48.13

Härmä, M. (2015). Promoting Older Workers’ Job Retention and Health by Working Hour Patterns. 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9798-6_14

Harris, K., Krygsman, S., Waschenko, J., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Ageism and the Older Worker: A Scoping Review. The Gerontologist, 58(2), e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/GNW194

Kang, H., & Kim, H. (2022). Ageism and Psychological Well-Being Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221087023/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_23337214221087023-FIG1.JPEG

Khavinson, V., Popovich, I., & Mikhailova, O. (2020). Towards realization of longer life. Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(3), e2020054. https://doi.org/10.23750/ABM.V91I3.10079

Lagacé, M., Van de Beeck, L., & Firzly, N. (2019). Building on Intergenerational Climate to Counter Ageism in the Workplace? A Cross-Organizational Study. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1535346

Macdonald, J., Issues, S. L.-J. of S., & 2016, undefined. (2016). Ageism in the workplace: The role of psychosocial factors in predicting job satisfaction, commitment, and engagement. Wiley Online Library, 72(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12161

Macunovich, D. J. (2013). Birth Quake. Birth Quake. https://doi.org/10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226500928.001.0001

Mak, S., & Thomas, A. (2022). Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(5), 565. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1

Marchiondo, L. A., Gonzales, E., & Williams, L. J. (2019). Trajectories of Perceived Workplace Age Discrimination and Long-Term Associations With Mental, Self-Rated, and Occupational Health. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(4), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONB/GBX095

McConatha, J. T., Kumar, V. K., Magnarelli, J., & Hanna, G. (2023). The Gendered Face of Ageism in the Workplace. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(1), 528-536. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13844

Mori, K., Odagami, K., Inagaki, M., Moriya, K., Fujiwara, H., & Eguchi, H. (2024). Work engagement among older workers: a systematic review. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/JOCCUH/UIAD008

Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., McLnerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., Peters, M., & Tricco, A. C. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 950–952. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

Muramatsu, N., Yin, L., health, T. L. environmental research and public, & 2017, undefined. (n.d.). Building health promotion into the job of home care aides: transformation of the workplace health environment. Mdpi.Com. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/384

United Nations. (2019). World Population Ageing 2019.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71

Patnaik, B. (2022). Ageism and Mental Health of the Elderly. Handbook of Aging, Health and Public Policy, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_98-1

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

Petery, G. A., & Grosch, J. W. (2022). Broadening the View of Workplace Ageism. Work, Aging and Retirement, 20(4), 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/WORKAR/WAAC015

Poscia, A., Moscato, U., La Milia, D. I., Milovanovic, S., Stojanovic, J., Borghini, A., Collamati, A., Ricciardi, W., & Magnavita, N. (2016). Workplace health promotion for older workers: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-016-1518-Z

Rahn, G., Martiny, S. E., & Nikitin, J. (2021). Feeling Out of Place: Internalized Age Stereotypes Are Associated With Older Employees’ Sense of Belonging and Social Motivation. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/WORKAR/WAAA005

Rasset, P., Mange, J., & Augustinova, M. (2024). What do we really know about age-related stereotypes and well-being of older adults? A commentary on the state of the art. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1358403. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2024.1358403

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., Blunt, H., Brigham, T., Chang, S., Clark, J., Conway, A., Couban, R., de Kock, S., Farrah, K., Fehrmann, P., Foster, M., Fowler, S. A., Glanville, J., … Young, S. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(2), 174–200–174–200. https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2021.962

Ribeiro-Gonçalves, J. A., Costa, P. A., & Leal, I. (2023). Loneliness, ageism, and mental health: The buffering role of resilience in seniors. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCHP.2022.100339

Roscigno, V. J., Zheng, H., & Crowley, M. (2022). Workplace Age Discrimination and Social-psychological Well-being. Society and Mental Health, 12(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/21568693221116139/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_21568693221116139-FIG2.JPEG

Shaw, B. A., Liang, J., & Krause, N. (2010). Age and race differences in the trajectories of self-esteem. Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0018242

Takeuhi, M., & Katagiri, K. (2024). Effects of workplace ageism on negative perception of aging and subjective well-being of older adults according to gender and employment status. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 24, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14819

Topa, G., Depolo, M., & Alcover, C. M. (2017). Early Retirement: A Meta-Analysis of Its Antecedent and Subsequent Correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JAN), 2157. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.02157

United Nations. (2021). Decade of Healthy Ageing: Plan of Action.

Von Humboldt, S., Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., Costa, A., Low, G., & Leal, I. (2022). Is age an issue? Psychosocial differences in perceived older workers’ work (un)adaptability, effectiveness, and workplace age discrimination. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2156657

von Humboldt, S., Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., Costa, A., Low, G., & Leal, I. (2023). Is age an issue? Psychosocial differences in perceived older workers’ work (un)adaptability, effectiveness, and workplace age discrimination. Educational Gerontology, 49(8), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2156657

Voss, P., Bodner, E., & Rothermund, K. (2018). Ageism: The Relationship between Age Stereotypes and Age Discrimination. International Perspectives on Aging, 19, 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_2

Weber, J., Angerer, P., & Müller, A. (2019). Individual consequences of age stereotypes on older workers : A systematic review. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 52(Suppl 3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00391-019-01506-6

World Health Organization. (2021). GLOBAL REPORT ON: AGEISM. World Health Organization. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep33107.10

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.

Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Sara Elisa Alves, Helder Fernandes, Carlos Magalhães, Adília Fernandes, Josiana Vaz, Ana Pereira, Miguel Monteiro